Custom software
Systems built for how your business actually runs, replacing the spreadsheets and workarounds holding it together.
How it worksDeployment against contracts, attendance captured at site, statutory records per worker, and client billing reconciled against the payroll cost it has to cover.
Manpower, security, housekeeping, and facility contractors run a business with a very thin spread and two very large numbers either side of it. One is what the client is billed for people deployed. The other is what those people are paid, plus contributions, plus the cost of the ones who did not turn up and had to be covered. Both are assembled monthly, by hand, from attendance registers at sites the office never sees, and the margin is whatever is left. The statutory exposure sits on top: as the employer of record you carry obligations the client will be asked about first. In this sector the leaks are small, constant, and almost always in the client's favour.
Built on the same core our products run on, extended with the records and rules this sector is actually judged against. These are scopes we build and integrate, not shelf modules with a licence key.
Client contracts holding required headcount by skill, shift, and site, with billing rates and statutory components stated, and the planned deployment derived from that rather than maintained separately.
Shift-level attendance captured at the site by supervisor, biometric device, or geotagged check-in, feeding billing and payroll from one record instead of two transcriptions. This is the single change that closes most of the leak.
Substitutions recorded as what they are, so cover is billed to the contract that consumed it, and overtime is authorised against a rule rather than settled in arrears.
Worker records, wage registers, and contribution computation maintained continuously per establishment and per contract, so a return is generated rather than reconstructed.
Invoices raised from deployed and attended man-days against the contracted rate, including statutory components and service charge, with deductions and penalties applied against the clause they arise from.
Billed value against the full cost to serve per contract and per site, including wages, contributions, uniform, equipment, and supervision, which is the only view that shows which sites are worth keeping.
Compliance fails when it is a parallel activity. These obligations are carried by the system that runs the operation, so the evidence exists because of how work was recorded rather than because someone assembled it afterwards.
Licences, registrations, worker registers, wage records, and the evidence a principal employer is entitled to ask for, held per establishment and per client contract rather than compiled the week an inspection lands.
Contributions and wage floors computed from the attendance and category records already in the system, with the scheduled employment rate applicable to that state and skill class applied rather than remembered. The computation is the system's job; the filing stays yours.
Deployment, attendance, and compliance evidence producible per client on demand, and the personal data of a large and changing workforce held with access control and retention that can be explained under the Digital Personal Data Protection Act.
The sector layer is built. The operational core underneath it is not a proposal: it is running in production with clients today.
Replacements are recorded at the site, so the man-day that was paid for reaches the invoice that should carry it.
Payroll and client billing derive from the same record, which removes the monthly reconciliation between them entirely.
Full cost to serve against billed value, contract by contract, so an unprofitable site is a decision rather than a discovery.
Which of these applies depends on how well the constraint is already understood. A review that finds the real one usually turns into a build.
Systems built for how your business actually runs, replacing the spreadsheets and workarounds holding it together.
How it worksTurning scattered records into dependable, current reporting that leaders can act on rather than argue about.
How it worksThen capture goes where the work is, in the simplest form that survives it: a supervisor marking a shift on a phone in a few taps, a biometric or card device where the client already has one, or a geotagged check-in. What has to stop is the register being typed up in the office days later, because that is the step where billing and payroll start disagreeing.
It can, but that is rarely where we start. The expensive problem is upstream: attendance, deployment, and the link to client billing. We build that first and feed your existing payroll from it, then look at whether replacing payroll adds anything. Often it does not.
No software can, and anyone claiming otherwise is overselling. Compliance is a legal determination. What the system does is compute contributions and wage floors from real attendance and category data, keep the registers current, and make every answer retrievable when an inspector or a principal employer asks. That is the part that is normally missing.